Is City Management Still Worth It?

The question rarely arrives during the good moments. It comes late at night, on the drive home after a difficult meeting, or after criticism that feels less like disagreement and more like a judgment of who you are.

Written by Chris Mann, City Manager of Wildomar, California, and host of the Gov360 podcast.

For many local government professionals, this is no longer a hypothetical question. The work has become more visible, the political environment has become more volatile, and public discourse has become less civil. Social media can transform incomplete information into a settled narrative before professionals have an opportunity to respond. Even experienced leaders are beginning to ask whether the meaning found in public service is still worth its personal and professional cost.

What Draws Us to the Work

Few people enter local government leadership because they expect it to be easy. They enter because the work matters.

I started my journey in public service on the elected side of the equation in my mid-20's. Early in my elected career, I supported and voted to approve a park project. Months later, I drove past it after it had opened. Children were on the playground. Families were gathered. Residents were enjoying something that had not existed before.

Most of the people using the park had no idea what it took to make that project a reality. They didn't know or care who proposed it, who negotiated for the land, who called in political favors to secure the votes, or who on the staff side spent coutless hours bringing the vision to life. But it was there, and it was making a material differnece in people's lives.

That experience captured for me what makes local government different. The results of the work become part of the places where people live their lives. A park, a road, a fire station, a balanced budget, or a more capable organization may never generate widespread applause, yet each can strengthen a community for decades. That ability to create lasting, tangible impact is what draws many of us to public service. It is also what makes leaving so difficult.

The Work Was Never Supposed to Be Easy

Local government leadership has always been demanding. Resources are limited, expectations are high, and problems do not arrive one at a time. Leaders routinely confront competing priorities, imperfect information, and choices in which every available option carries a cost.

Leadership in this profession is rarely about choosing between good and bad. More often, it is about choosing between hard and harder. A structurally unbalanced budget may require service reductions, organizational changes, new revenue, or some combination of all three. An overdue infrastructure project may be necessary even when its construction disrupts businesses and residents. An organizational reform may strengthen the institution while unsettling people who were comfortable with the old system.

These decisions are difficult because the consequences are real. That has always been part of the responsibility. What has changed is the environment in which those decisions are made.

When Competence Is Not Protection

Many of us entered the profession with an implicit understanding of how the system worked. Do the job well. Remain professional. Treat people fairly. Stay out of partisan politics. Make sound recommendations. Protect the institution.

Those principles remain essential, but the difficult truth is that they do not guarantee stability. Competence does not make a leader immune from political pressure. Neutrality does not prevent others from assigning political motives. Ethical conduct does not ensure that every accusation will be made in good faith.

The world in which public sector leaders operate has changed significantly. Social media has accelerated the spread of information and misinformation while giving keyboard warriors an immediate platform to shape public narratives, often before the facts are fully understood. At the same time, declining civility in public discourse has created an environment in which every controversy feels urgent and elected officials face intense pressure to resolve every problem, real or perceived, almost instantly. That immediacy makes thoughtful governance more difficult. Long-range planning, patient trust-building, and careful deliberation give way to short-term reactions driven by the loudest voices or the latest online outrage. Public leaders must now manage not only the substance of complex issues, but also the speed, emotion, and distorted perceptions surrounding them.

At one point in my career, I led a city in which organized opposition decided that change itself was the enemy. Before I had the opportunity to establish a record or earn trust, I became a symbol in someone else’s political conflict. What followed was not ordinary disagreement. It was a sustained campaign of disinformation, personal attacks, and pressure intended to force a leadership change.

The experience affected more than my professional life. It affected my family, tested my resolve, and eventually led to my departure from that city. But it did not cause me to lose faith in public service.

What I lost were illusions. I stopped believing that competence alone could protect a leader. I stopped assuming that neutrality would always be recognized as neutrality. I stopped equating professional success with longevity in a particular position. That chapter did not make the profession less meaningful for me, but I believe it did make my understanding of it more honest.

A Better Measure of a Career

Local government professionals often measure success through visible milestones: years of service, organizations led, projects completed, budgets balanced, and promotions earned. Those measures have value, but they are incomplete. A long tenure does not automatically mean a leader was effective, and a difficult departure does not erase the good work that came before it.

A more durable assessment begins with different questions. Did I lead with integrity? Did I protect and develop the people entrusted to me? Did I make the institution stronger? Did I serve the community honestly? Did I remain true to my values when doing so carried a cost?

Those questions shift the focus from validation to stewardship. They also recognize a reality that experienced public leaders eventually confront: we control our conduct, but we do not control every outcome.

Councils change. Political coalitions shift. Community expectations evolve. Narratives form. Sometimes a leader can do meaningful, ethical, and highly competent work and still reach the end of a particular chapter. That ending does not determine the value of everything that preceded it.

The Quiet Impact of Public Service

The most meaningful results of city management are often the least visible. A department head becomes a confident executive because someone trusted them before they fully trusted themselves. An organization withstands a financial crisis because years earlier its leaders built reserves and strengthened its systems. Employees continue serving the public during a period of political turmoil because their leadership provides stability. A neighborhood becomes safer because a team persisted through years of planning, funding, public engagement, and implementation.

These outcomes rarely go viral. They may never appear in a performance review or public proclamation. Residents who benefit from them may never know the names of the people responsible. But they matter.

City management offers the unusual opportunity to influence both institutions and communities. A manager can help create the conditions in which employees grow, organizations mature, and public services improve. That is a form of impact few professions can match.

Acknowledging the Cost

Meaning should not be used to romanticize unhealthy conditions. This profession can be lonely. Senior leaders often carry information they cannot share and worries they cannot distribute. They are expected to absorb frustration, remain composed, and continue making decisions while others question their judgment or motives.

The line between professional criticism and personal attack has also become less distinct. Families experience the consequences. Spouses hear the comments. Children encounter social media posts. Personal time is interrupted by emergencies, controversies, and the knowledge that a leader is never entirely off duty.

Some capable professionals will decide that the cost has become too high. They may move into the private sector, consulting, another area of public service, or a different kind of life altogether. Those choices are valid. Staying is not a moral obligation, and leaving is not an admission of failure.

Public service should never require martyrdom. The objective is not to endure any environment indefinitely. It is to make intentional decisions rooted in values, boundaries, and an honest assessment of what the work is asking from us.

What the Profession Needs Now

Local government does not need leaders who sacrifice themselves to prove their commitment. It needs grounded leaders who can remain steady without becoming emotionally detached, communicate clearly without becoming performative, and understand political dynamics without becoming partisan.

It needs leaders who protect their teams, build trusted relationships, and recognize when the pressure of the work is beginning to distort their judgment or diminish their effectiveness. Professionalism remains the foundation, but it should not be mistaken for a shield.

Today’s leaders must pair technical competence with emotional discipline, relational awareness, and clear communication. They must know when to engage, when to listen, when to correct the record, and when silence is the more responsible choice. They must also maintain a life and identity beyond the position.

Titles are temporary. Council support can change. Even the strongest professional chapter will eventually end. Leaders who tie their entire sense of worth to a role become especially vulnerable when circumstances shift. Purpose is more durable than position.

What We Should Tell the Next Generation

Given the challenges facing the profession, should we still encourage young people to pursue city management?

Yes, but we should describe the work honestly. We should tell them that public service can be deeply rewarding without promising that it will always be fair. We should teach them that good judgment matters while acknowledging that good decisions will not always be popular. We should prepare them to manage conflict, communicate under pressure, and recognize the difference between constructive criticism and organized hostility.

We should also tell them what makes the work extraordinary. They will have opportunities to shape communities, strengthen institutions, and improve the daily lives of people they may never meet. They will work alongside talented professionals who care deeply about the public. They will encounter problems with no easy answers and discover that they are capable of more than they expected.

If they lead well, much of their impact will occur quietly. That does not make it less important.

Choosing Meaning with Clear Eyes

So, is city management still worth it?

Yes. Not because the work is easy, the position is secure, or competence guarantees appreciation. It is worth it because the profession still offers something increasingly rare: the opportunity to matter.

It offers the opportunity to shape the places where people build their lives, strengthen institutions that will outlast any individual leader, help others grow, and remain steady when circumstances are not. The work does not promise comfort. It offers significance.

Choosing city management today requires clear eyes. It means recognizing the personal cost, maintaining healthy boundaries, and accepting that no position is permanent. It means measuring success by more than tenure, praise, or professional advancement. It means choosing service over applause, stewardship over ego, and meaning over ease.

That is not a choice every person must make forever. But for those who continue to feel called to the work, it remains an honorable and consequential one.

City management is still worth it. Because even within its most difficult chapters, we retain the opportunity to lead with integrity and leave something stronger behind.

---

If this reflection resonates with you, I invite you to explore more leadership insights, resources, and long-form content at www.chrismann.us, and to watch or listen to Gov360 Episode 18, “Is City Management Still Worth It? Purpose, Impact, and Meaning in a Demanding Field,”where these concepts are explored in greater depth.

I also invite you to join the  Gov360 Community on Patreon. This new, private community gives local government professionals a place to connect with peers, exchange ideas, find support, and navigate the challenges of public service alongside people who understand the work.

---

About the Author

Chris Mann serves as City Manager for the City of Wildomar, California. He writes about leadership, governance, and the realities of public service in local government and hosts the Gov360 podcast.